Understanding primary care networks: context, benefits and risks | The Health Foundation
This briefing places Primary Care Networks (PCNs) in the context of previous changes to general practice funding and contracting. It examines the rationale for networks, explores relevant evidence and draws out intended benefits and possible risks for the future of PCNs.
From 1 July 2019, all patients in England will be covered by a primary care network (PCN) – the most significant reform to general practice in England in a generation.
PCNs should help to integrate primary care with secondary and community services, and bridge a gap between general practice and emerging Integrated Care Systems.
Since January 2019, practices have been organising themselves into local networks to provide care at greater scale by sharing staff and some of their funding.
While PCNs offer huge potential to integrate care and improve services, there is a risk that the speed of implementation will undermine the best intentions of the policy.
This handbook offers options to groups of practices looking to establish a primary care network (PCN) British Medical Association (BMA)
PCNs are groups of general practices working closely together, with other primary and community care staff and health and care organisations, providing integrated services to their local populations. The BMA have created a handbook which provides advice and offers options to groups of practices looking to establish a PCN.
Integrated care is not quick, or cheap, but new systematic review finds sufficient evidence that it is a goal worth pursuing
The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) has published Ways of integrating care that better coordinate services may benefit patients. This systematic review, part of the NIHR Signal series, looks at international literature to understand how new care models may affect patients, providers and systems. It includes a qualitative review of attitudes, barriers and enablers of integration and finds new integrated care models can increase patient satisfaction, perceived quality of care and improve access to services. It is less clear whether there may be effects on hospital admissions, appointments or healthcare costs.
The impact of integrated care teams on hospital use in North East Hampshire and Farnham | The Health Foundation
This briefing examines the early effects on hospital use of introducing multidisciplinary integrated care teams (ICTs) in North East Hampshire and Farnham. There is evidence to suggest that the value of ICTs might lie in their potential to improve patients’ health, health confidence, experience of care and quality of life rather than reducing emergency hospital use.
This briefing examines the early effects on hospital use of introducing multidisciplinary integrated care teams (ICTs) in North East Hampshire and Farnham (NEHF). It presents the findings of an evaluation conducted by the Improvement Analytics Unit, a partnership between NHS England and the Health Foundation.
The analysis shows that during the first 23 months of the programme’s implementation, patients referred to the ICTs attended A&E more frequently, and were admitted as an emergency more often, than the control group. This may be because the ICTs identified urgent unmet need amongst their patients or it may be that more time was needed for the benefits of ICTs on hospital use to be seen.
In conclusion, a reduction in emergency hospital use may not be an appropriate objective for these type of multidisciplinary teams, at least in their early stages. Reducing emergency hospital use was only one of the objectives for ICTs in NEHF.
There is evidence to suggest that the value of ICTs might lie in their potential to improve patients’ health, health confidence, experience of care and quality of life.
A year of integrated care systems: reviewing the journey so far | Kings Fund
The aim of this study was to understand how Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) are developing, and identify emerging lessons for local systems and national policy-makers. 72 interviews were conducted with NHS and local government leaders and other stakeholders to examine progress in eight of the first ICSs.
Although ICSs have only been in operation for a year, the report found encouraging signs of progress. The evidence reported shows that partner organisations and their leaders are working more collaboratively to manage performance and finances across a system in a way that was not happening previously.
Evidence of tangible improvements in services and outcomes is limited to date, but this is to be expected given the brief time ICSs have been in existence. This must be a key priority for all ICSs going forward. The report found broad consensus that the ICS model has real potential to bring about improvements in health and care, and to place services on a sustainable footing.
This report traces the development and impact of integrated care to date, highlights some examples of successful practice and draws out the key lessons for later-adopters | National Association of Primary Care
This report suggests that a number of of factors – ageing populations, an increased prevalence of multiple chronic disease and rising expectations of what health care and technology can offer – combined with limited human and financial resources, have placed health systems under intolerable and unsustainable strain.
Integrated Care Systems, where health providers collaborate with other community stakeholders to prevent ill health, provide more comprehensive care closer to home, keep people out of hospital and reduce costs, is seen as the antidote to these problems. This approach is now spreading around the world, taking many different forms from country to country.
This report of a two-day symposium attended by health experts from the UK, USA and Ireland, traces the development and impact of integrated care to date, highlights some examples of successful practice and draws out the key lessons for later-adopters.